QSE 3 — Equipment

Key Concepts

Key Concepts: This QSE describes the selection, use, maintenance, and monitoring of equipment, including information systems. It also describes the use and testing of alternative systems when primary systems fail.

Key Terms
Backup: Digital data and/or physical storage containing copies of relevant data.

Calibrate: To set or align measurement equipment against a known standard.

Corrective Action: Actions taken to address the root cause(s) of an existing nonconformance or other undesirable situation in order to reduce or eliminate recurrence.

Critical Equipment/Materials/Tasks: A piece of equipment, material, service, or task that can affect the quality of the organization’s products or services.

Data Integrity: The accuracy, completeness, and consistency of information.

Equipment: A durable item, instrument, or device used in a process or procedure.

Installation Qualification: Verification that the correct equipment is received and that it is installed according to specifications and the manufacturer’s recommendations in an environment suitable for its operation and use.

Operational Qualification: Verification that equipment will function according to the operational specifications provided by the manufacturer.

Performance Qualification: Verification that equipment performs consistently as expected for its intended use in the organization’s environment, using the organization’s procedures and supplies.

Validation: Establishing evidence that a process, executed by users in their environment, will consistently meet predetermined specifications.

Verification: Confirmation by examination and provision of objective evidence that specified requirements have been met.

Examples of Objective Evidence:

  • Policies, processes, and procedures related to this chapter.
  • Processes for equipment selection, qualification, and maintenance.
  • List or tool used for critical equipment identification.
  • Equipment calibration and maintenance records, if applicable.
  • Equipment qualification records.
  • Manufacturer’s written instructions.
  • Records of investigation of equipment malfunction, failure, repair, and requalification, if applicable.
  • Alarm system testing and records of alarm management, if appropriate.
  • Evidence of information system backup and records of testing.

3.0 Equipment

The organization shall define and control critical equipment.

The facility is required to define a list of equipment that is critical to its operations. Critical equipment
used for collection, processing, and storage of samples should be suitable for the task and be maintained appropriately. Acceptable operational limits for equipment should be defined, and processes and procedures should indicate the course of action when these limits are not achieved. (SS)

The committee revised standard 3.0 based on updates to the AABB Quality System Essentials. (SC)

3.1 Equipment Specifications

Equipment specifications shall be defined before purchase.

Standard 3.1 is a commonly cited standard for nonconformances. Examples of the reasoning behind the nonconformances include the following:

  1. Equipment maintenance is not performed per manufacturer’s instructions.
  2. There is no evidence of validation of new equipment.
  3. There is no procedure for assessing acceptability of cellular therapy products when equipment is found to be out of calibration. (SS)

The committee revised standard 3.1 based on updates to the AABB Quality System Essentials. (SC)

3.2 Qualification of Equipment

[Cord blood applicable]

All critical equipment shall be qualified for its intended use. Equipment shall be requalified, as needed, after repairs and upgrades.

The committee revised standard 3.2 based on updates to the AABB Quality System Essentials. (SC)

3.2.1 Installation Qualification

Equipment shall be installed per manufacturer specifications.

3.2.2 Operational Qualification

Each piece of equipment and component of an information system shall be verified before actual use.

The committee revised standard 3.2.2 to mirror all other AABB Standards and to match the AABB Quality System Essentials. (SC)

3.2.3 Performance Qualification

Equipment shall perform as expected for its intended use.

The committee revised standard 3.2.3 to mirror all other AABB Standards and to match the AABB Quality System Essentials. (SC)

3.2.3.1

Facility-developed predetermined criteria shall meet the specifications established by the manufacturer or be qualified for its intended use.

When considering equipment purchase or relocation, the facility should have a documented process verifying that the equipment or system is capable of performing the expected task or controlling the activity according to written and preapproved specifications. The equipment or system should be tested to ensure that it performs as described in the manufacturer’s specifications, in the operator’s manual, or in facility expectations. In this last phase of the equipment qualification cycle, the facility verifies that the user requirements and specifications are met. (SS)

The committee edited standard 3.2.3.1 through the inclusion of the clause, “…or be qualified for its intended use.” recognizing that there are parameters set forth by facilities for use. This ensures that accredited institutions are meeting those expectations and requirements. The committee also deleted the clause “or exceed” that appeared in the 11th edition as all standards can be exceeded in practice. (SC)

3.3 Use of Equipment

Equipment shall be used in accordance with the manufacturer’s written instructions.

Before the actual selection of equipment for use, criteria to consider are the types of procedures to be performed, the reports to be prepared, the intended instrument operators, the type of environment in which the equipment will be used, the expected production time, and other facility- or practice-specific needs. These criteria can then be used to assess the various equipment options and determine which ones best meet the needs (qualification). After selection, the equipment should then be validated to ensure that it operates as expected and that an appropriate intended output can be produced before its use for patient care. If equipment cannot be used in accordance with the manufacturer’s written instructions, evaluation of the impact of that deviation should be part of the validation protocol. (SS)

3.4 Unique Identification of Equipment

[Cord blood applicable]

Equipment shall have unique identification.

The committee revised standard 3.4 to mirror all other AABB Standards and to match the AABB Quality System Essentials. (SC)

3.5 Equipment Monitoring and Maintenance

Equipment shall be monitored and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s written instructions.

The committee revised standard 3.5 to mirror all other AABB Standards and to match the AABB Quality System Essentials. (SC)

3.5.1 Calibration and Accuracy of Equipment

[Cord blood applicable]

Calibrations and/or adjustments shall be performed using equipment and materials that have adequate accuracy and precision. At a minimum, calibrations and/or adjustments shall be confirmed as described below unless otherwise indicated by the manufacturer:

  1. Before use.
  2. After activities that may affect the calibration.
  3. At prescribed intervals.

Appropriate calibration and maintenance of equipment includes a number of concepts. All equipment must be properly installed and calibrated before use, with appropriate records maintained of any problems encountered and corrected. The organization must develop appropriate processes and schedules for ongoing calibration, preventive maintenance, and quality control. Records of calibration, preventive maintenance, and repairs must be maintained. Defective equipment must be identified, controlled, and managed to ensure that it is not used. A system for reporting adverse events to the manufacturer must be in place. (SS)

The committee revised standard 3.5.1 to mirror all other AABB Standards and to match the AABB Quality System Essentials. (SC)

3.5.1.1

Calibration of equipment shall include details of equipment type, unique identification, location, frequency of checks, check method, acceptance criteria, and specified limitations.

The committee revised standard 3.5.1.1 to mirror all other AABB Standards and to match the AABB Quality System Essentials. (SC)

3.5.1.2

Equipment used for calibration, inspection, measuring, and testing shall be certified to meet nationally recognized measurement standards. Certification shall occur before initial use, after repair, and at prescribed intervals. Where no such measurement standards exist, the basis for calibration shall be described and recorded.

The committee revised standard 3.5.1.2 to mirror all other AABB Standards and to match the AABB Quality System Essentials. (SC)

3.5.1.3

Equipment shall be safeguarded from adjustments that would invalidate the calibration setting.

3.5.1.4

The organization shall identify equipment that is to be maintained in a calibrated state.

3.5.1.5

The organization shall determine the measurements to be made and the accuracy and precision required.

3.5.2

[Cord blood applicable]

When equipment is found to be out of calibration or specification, the validity of previous inspection and test results and the conformance of potentially affected products or services (including those that have already been released or delivered) shall be verified.

The committee revised standard 3.5.2 to mirror all other AABB Standards and to match the AABB Quality System Essentials. (SC)

3.5.3

[Cord blood applicable]

The organization shall:

  1. Define cleaning and sanitization methods and intervals for equipment.
  2. Ensure that environmental conditions are suitable for the operations, calibrations, inspections, measurements, and tests carried out.
  3. Remove equipment from service that is malfunctioning/out of service and communicate to appropriate personnel.
  4. Monitor equipment to ensure that defined parameters are maintained.
  5. Ensure that the handling, maintenance, and storage of equipment are such that the equipment remains fit for use.
  6. Ensure that all equipment maintenance and repairs are performed by qualified individuals and in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations.

Standard 3.2 applies.

When equipment or systems undergo preventive maintenance, calibration, or repairs, the facility should verify that the person performing the maintenance work is trained and qualified to perform the task. The facility should verify that there is a record or report about the type of work performed. The maintenance work performed should match the expectations of the facility, the agreement with the service provider, and the specifications of the manufacturer’s/operator’s manual. (SS)

The committee revised standard 3.5.3 to mirror all other AABB Standards and to match the AABB Quality System Essentials. (SC)

3.5.4 Investigation and Follow-Up

Investigation and follow-up of equipment malfunctions, failures, or adverse events shall include:

  1. Assessment of products or services provided since the equipment was last known to be functioning per the manufacturer’s written instructions or organization-defined specifications.
  2. Assessment of the effect on the safety of individuals affected.
  3. Removal of equipment from service, if indicated.
  4. Investigation of the malfunction, failure, or adverse event, and a determination if other equipment is similarly affected, as applicable.
  5. Requalification of the equipment.
  6. Reporting the nature of the malfunction, failure, or adverse event to the manufacturer, when indicated.

The committee added standard 3.5.4 to mirror all other AABB Standards and to match the AABB Quality System Essentials. (SC)

3.6 Equipment Traceability

[Cord blood applicable]

The organization shall maintain records of equipment use in a manner that permits:

  1. Equipment to be uniquely identified and traceable.
  2. Tracing of any given product or service to all equipment associated with the procurement, processing, storage, distribution, and administration of the product or service.
  3. Identification and recall of all cellular therapy products associated with a specific piece of equipment.

3.7 Information Systems

[Cord blood applicable]

The organization shall have controls in place for the implementation, use, ongoing support, and modifications of information system software, hardware, and databases. Elements of planning and ongoing control shall include:

  1. Numeric designation of system versions with inclusive dates of use.
  2. Validation/verification/qualification of system software, hardware, databases, and user-defined tables before implementation.
  3. Fulfillment of life-cycle requirements for internally developed software.
  4. Defined processes for system operation and maintenance.
  5. Defined process for authorizing and documenting modifications to the system.
  6. System security to prevent unauthorized access.
  7. Policies, processes, and procedures and other instructional documents developed using terminology that is understandable to the user.
  8. Functionality that allows for display and verification of data before final acceptance of the additions or alterations.
  9. Defined process for monitoring of data integrity for critical data elements.
  10. System design that establishes and maintains unique identity of the donor, the product, or the service, and the recipient (as applicable).
  11. Training and competency of personnel who use information systems.
  12. Procedures to ensure confidentiality of protected information.

The committee revised standard 3.7 to mirror all other AABB Standards and to match the AABB Quality System Essentials. (SC)

3.7.1 Alternative Systems

[F]

An alternative system shall be maintained to ensure continuous operation in the event that computerized data and computer-assisted functions are unavailable. The alternate system shall be tested at defined intervals. Processes and procedures shall address mitigation of the effects of disasters and include recovery plans.

The purchase of computer software, hardware, or databases should have adequate supplier qualification. For example, if the facility is purchasing computer software that will be used by the entire facility, the program should request an opportunity to provide input to ensure that it meets the program’s needs. Similarly, if the facility places an order for software, hardware, or databases to be used in its department, it should identify necessary requirements and ensure that the software, hardware, or databases to be obtained or modified will be capable of meeting those requirements. It should ensure that the information systems department can provide adequate technical support.

Once the system is obtained, training of applicable staff must be provided, and the equipment and software must be validated to ensure that it performs as intended. It must be tested in a “live” environment (“implementation”), and once it has been functioning for a few days or weeks, the facility should determine whether the system is operating as anticipated and generating expected results (“evaluation and postimplementation”). Whether software is developed in-house or is purchased and then modified, software that involves critical processes must go through the same rigorous stages in risk analysis, training, validation, implementation, and postimplementation evaluation of effectiveness.

Standard 3.7, #3 requires records of the fulfillment of life-cycle requirements for internally developed software. The term “fulfillment of life-cycle requirements” refers to the completion of the series of stages that computer software is required to go through from its time of inception to retirement. These stages are defined by the software developer, and will depend on the product and the organization.

The typical development phase for internally developed software, including purchased software that is subsequently modified, includes:

  • Management of software.
  • Identification of requirements.
  • Design.
  • Coding.
  • Integration and testing.

Typical stages of software during and following implementation are:

  • Installation.
  • Acceptance testing.
  • Operation and support.
  • Maintenance.

For modifications that will be made during or after implementation, the development phase should be revisited. Based on the system, the facility will incorporate the life-cycle requirements into its processes and procedures. Records are required to be maintained throughout the life-cycle of the software.

In the event of a downtime where primary electronic systems are not operational, the facility must have an alternative validated method that allows access to critical information as well as continuous operation of critical computer-related activities. Although the standards do not stipulate, the alternative systems may use manual paper or an electronically based approach. (SS)

The committee revised standard 3.7.1 to mirror all other AABB Standards and to match the AABB Quality System Essentials. (SC)

3.7.2

Personnel responsible for management of information systems shall be responsible for compliance with the regulations that affect the use of the system.

The committee added standard 3.7.2 to mirror all other AABB Standards and to match the AABB Quality System Essentials. (SC)

3.7.3

The organization shall support the management of information systems.

The committee added standard 3.7.3 to mirror all other AABB Standards and to match the AABB Quality System Essentials. (SC)

3.7.4

A system designed to prevent unauthorized access to computers and electronic records shall be in place.

The committee added standard 3.7.4 to mirror all other AABB Standards and to match the AABB Quality System Essentials. (SC)

3.7.5

The organization shall have measures in place to minimize the risk of internal and external data breaches.

Cellular therapy facilities store a great deal of donor- and patient-specific confidential data. Like any organization in today’s world, it is its responsibility to protect this data from an internal or external breach. Policies and procedures aimed at this are often determined at the highest level of an organization. Examples of policies may include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Information security policies are in place and being followed.
  • Compliance is audited. (For example, do people change passwords frequently enough and keep them secure?)
  • All reports/electronic communications, etc, carrying sensitive/confidential information are controlled and disposed of securely.
  • Assessment of the need to encrypt transmitted data.
  • Data extraction is controlled (eg, prohibiting staff from running a query on the facility’s database and generating an excel spreadsheet that they keep on their laptop without proper security controls).
  • All hardware to be disposed of has been appropriately data-cleansed.
  • Staff have been trained in the basics of data protection (eg, training documentation should show that they were instructed not to open a suspicious attachment in an email, click on links in emails from unknown senders, or navigate to websites that are questionable.

Management staff should have knowledge of and be able to explain, at least at a general level, the policies surrounding data protection in their organization. (SS)

3.8 Technology Infrastructure

[F]

The organization shall have an active program to ensure that critical technology and communication infrastructures function as intended, including risk-based monitoring or testing at facility-defined intervals. Standards 1.4, 1.5, and 1.6 apply.

The committee created new standard 3.8 to ensure that facilities monitor their critical technology infrastructure and that they function as expected. This standard requires that there are defined checks to monitor that technology is working as intended and expected. (SC)

3.9 Alarm Systems

[F]

Storage devices for cellular therapy products shall have alarms and shall conform to the following standards:

Quality control testing for alarm systems needs to ensure the alarms are being activated and the temperature-recording device is responding before the temperature-sensing device (probe) reaches an unacceptable temperature. An electronic alarm test that merely increases or decreases the electronic digital readout to determine if the audio alarm sounds would not meet the intent of these standards. The temperature-sensing device is not being tested to determine if it is sending the signal to activate the alarm, but whether the recording device is responding to allow proper action before unacceptable temperatures are detected. If the electronic test is increasing and decreasing the actual temperature of the probe to verify 1) the probe is sending the signal to activate the alarms and 2) the recording device is documenting when inappropriate temperatures are reached, then this method would meet the intent of these standards. (SS)

The committee added new standard 3.9 for completeness. This standard does appear in other AABB Standards that require the use of alarm systems. The committee felt that having these elements in chapter 3 was necessary as it relates to equipment. The concept of alarm systems also appears in chapters 5 and 10 but these are not redundant. (SC)

3.9.1

The alarm shall be set to activate under conditions that will allow enough time for proper action to be taken before cellular therapy products reach unacceptable conditions.

The committee added new standard 3.9.1 for completeness. This standard does appear in other AABB Standards that require the use of alarm systems. The committee felt that having these elements in chapter 3 was necessary as it relates to equipment. The concept of alarm systems also appears in chapters 5 and 10 but these are not redundant. (SC)

3.9.2

Activation of an alarm shall initiate a process for immediate action, investigation, and appropriate corrective action.

The committee added new standard 3.9.2 for completeness. This standard does appear in other AABB Standards that require the use of alarm systems. The committee felt that having these elements in chapter 3 was necessary as it relates to equipment. The concept of alarm systems also appears in chapters 5 and 10 but these are not redundant. (SC)

Excerpt of Reference Standard 6.2.9A Relevant to Equipment

Standard Record to Be Maintained Quality System
Records
Donor Eligibility/
Management
Issues
Unit/
Recipient
Retention
after Creation
(C) or Final
Disposition
(F) of Related
Product
Minimum
Retention
Time (in
years)1
3.2 Equipment qualification X X X C 10 years after
retirement of
the equipment
3.4 Unique identification of
equipment
X X X C 10
3.5.1 Equipment calibration activities X X X C 10
3.5.2 Equipment found to be out
of calibration
X X X C 10
3.5.3 Equipment monitoring,
maintenance, calibration,
and repair
X X X C 10
3.6 Equipment traceability X X X C 10
3.7 Implementation and modification
of software, hardware,
or databases
X X X C 2 years after
retirement of
system
3.7.1 Testing of alternative systems X X X F 10
3.8 Monitoring of technology
infrastructure
X X X F 10
3.9 Alarm system check X X X F 10

1Applicable federal, state, or local law may exceed this period.